I wish it was as simple as stating "yes" or "no". Unfortunately, there have been so many lawsuits across the country between buyers and sellers regarding the "proper" disclosure, that there is now (for the most part) no excuse for Sellers' not knowing the proper standard.

The standard is a reasonable common sense standard. If the buyer can see the defect when they are inspecting your home, then you do not need to "tell them" (disclose) about the defect since it is readily observable. This, however, is not what results in lawsuits by the buyers. It’s the defects that the buyers can’t see,and later find out 6 months after moving into the home, that starts the lawsuit

What does this mean? As the seller, you are required to tell the buyers of defects that exist within your home, but that the buyers cannot see when they walk through your home. Prime examples are leaky roof, termites, or foundational cracks. As a seller if you know you have these problems or similar problems then you are required by law to tell the buyer so the buyer can make an informed decision on whether he/she wishes to still purchase the home.

Well, I know what you are asking now. What if I didn’t know? As mentioned before, this is a common sense standard so you are not required by law to disclose defects that you didn’t know about either. I still know what you are thinking now. As seller, I can probably identify 100 small little defects, i.e, chipped plaster in a small corner of my bedroom, stains along my floors in the kitchen or maybe a kitchen cabinet doesn’t properly close all the way. Remember, this is a common sense standard so only huge defects (material) that are not readily observable need to be disclosed. If the buyers would change their mind and not buy your home over the "defect", chances are the defect is material.

What this all boils down to is that as sellers you should put every known defect in your home on your seller disclosure to avoid any future liability.

So to conclude, just remember, when in doubt disclose in writing and you will be protected.

For more information on this and other real estate matters, contact one of our West Palm Beach lawyers at LaBovick Law Group.

Around our courthouse here in West Palm Beach, Florida there has been a constant grumbling by our judiciary about unprepared injury lawyers appearing in court. They have stated their new “policy” of enforcing their pre-trial orders and holding the lawyers’ feet to the fire to get the cases tried and justice served.
In our country, the respective parties have a right to a speedy and public trial, this holds true not only for criminal cases but for civil disputes as well. With every case noticed for trial, the court issues a pre-trial order directing the timing of the case and handing out deadlines for the progress of the case.
I was in court the other day to object to a move by the other party who was trying to obfuscate the judge’s order by scheduling a medical exam of my client well after the applicable deadline. After much bluster, the court granted the other side’s request for this exam. This came over my strong objections to the contrary. My plea to the court centered on the respect for the rules of the court and orders handed down by the Judges that are equally applied to both parties. I realized, at that moment, that the same court in West Palm Beach, Florida that complains about lack of diligence on the part of the lawyers rewards this very conduct by refusing to enforce their own orders for fear of reprisal from insurance companies, the appellate court and who knows what else.
My job as an officer of the court is to zealously represent my client, uphold the constitution and the orders of the court. This is becoming increasingly difficult when the final authority allows its own rules to be broken but only after complaining about the parties being allowed to break the rules. Our system is what is really broken and it needs to be fixed from the top down.

Have you recently opened an envelope from a law firm requesting that you immediately cease and desist using their client’s trade name or trademark? Trust me, this happens more frequently than you could imagine. Here are a few key tips you should consider in evaluating whether the law firm has a good or bad case against you and your business:

First of all, keep in mind that in Florida generic, geographic or descriptive trade names are not protected. Examples of generic words include car, boat, house or gun. Geographic words include coast, north or mountains. While descriptive words include long, red or strong. These types of words will always be available for use by the general public in most situations. Conversely, words that require the public to use their imagination in determining what product is being offered is generally going to receive protection from other companies use of the word or words. For example, Polaroid and Kodak require the public to think about the product actually being offered. Kleenex is another example that requires the public to think about the product actually being offered, which is a tissue.

Finally, how close is your business to the other business that is asking you and your company to cease from operating? Is it within the so called “territorial scope” of the other business? Keep in mind that the territorial scope varies depending on the product or service the other company offers. If it sells fast food, the territorial scope will be far less than a company that builds nuclear power plants.

Hopefully, this sheds some light on your questions regarding whether you should be alarmed by the cease and desist letter you just received. If you’re still concerned, please feel free to contact Scott Haft, Esq. at LaBovick Law Group for a free Florida Employment Law consultation.