March 16, 2011

Lehman Probe stalls in $50 Billion real estate accounting maneuver

A legal gray area may derail an attempt by Securities and Exchange Commission officials to seek a civil or criminal suit against executives of the now defunct Lehman Brothers Holding Inc.

For months now, SEC officials have been hoping to charge former Lehman Brothers executives with duping their investors with an accounting strategy that is commonly known as Repo 105. In such a maneuver, a short term loan is classified as a sale on company balance sheets. The proceeds of this so-called sale are then used to reduce company debt in advance of publication of the company’s balance sheets. Once the sheets have been made public, the company borrows funds in order to repurchase their original assets. The strategy provides the investing public with an improved version of the company’s actual financial records, leading them to continue to invest, or remain invested, when a more realistic accounting of the company’s financial records might lead them to choose to invest elsewhere.

Continue reading "Lehman Probe stalls in $50 Billion real estate accounting maneuver" »

Posted by LaBovick Law |

Posted In: Brokerage Firm , Financial Regulation , Investment Fraud , Investments , Investor Education

Tags: lehman brothers holdings" "Repo 105" "SEC

| Share
March 8, 2010

First Allied Securities agrees to pay nearly $2 Million to settle Securities Fraud charges of failing to supervise Broker

First Allied Securities, Inc, a San Diego-based broker-dealer, was charged with failing to reasonably supervise one of its registered representatives. The Broker engaged in unauthorized fraudulent trading in the accounts of two Florida municipalities. The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) reports that First Allied has agreed to settle the charges for nearly $2 Million.

The SEC alleges that Harold H. Jaschke, former First Allied Broker, churned the accounts of two Florida municipalities and misrepresented his trading practices on their behalf. The two Florida Municipalities involved, were the City of Kissimmee and the Tohopekaliga Water Authority. In late 2009, Harold Jashke was charged with fraud for making over $4 million in commissions while his customers lost money due to his fraudulent behavior.

The SEC found that this fraud occurred from May 2006 and March 2008. This matter could have been avoided if First Allied identified the "red flags" and adequately supervised Jaschke, according to SEC reports.

The supervision of broker-dealers is taken seriously by the SEC. Rosalind Tyson, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Office stated the following:

"By failing to establish reasonable systems to prevent Jaschke’s misconduct, Fist Allied did not fulfill its obligation to reasonably supervise its registered representative.”

In addition to the settlement, First Allied agreed to censorship by the SEC. They will cease and desist from “committing or causing any future violations of certain books and records provisions,” and will hire an independent consultant to review First Allied's company’s policies and procedures.

Investor Tip: Be aware of your Broker’s method of managing your portfolio. A common fraudulent practice by brokers is the use of excessive trading to generate commissions and other revenue without regard for the customer's investment objectives, this practice is known as churning.

We encourage Investors to read monthly statements carefully. Ask questions about your Broker's investment strategy for your portfolio. If you suspect find that a Broker is engaging in unethical behavior with your investments, speak up and do so quickly. This can help save many headaches if the fraud is caught early on.


Cllick on the following link to read more on First Allied Securities, Inc being charged with failing to Supervise.

Click on the following link to learn more about Churning and Securites Fraud.

Posted by LaBovick Law | | Comments (0)

Posted In: Brokerage Firm , Churning , Investment Fraud , SEC

| Share
November 20, 2009

Financial Services Divsion - Investment Fraud Seminar a Success

I am pleased to announce that yesterday our Investment Fraud Seminar in West Palm Beach was a huge success. It was held in the beautiful Phillips Point Club. The beautiful intracoastal was a great backdrop for this well attended Seminar.

The 4 hour seminar, Investing in a Post Madoff Environment: Financial Fraud: How it's accomplished, how to detect it, and how to recover from it was attended by over 100 people from South Florida. The attendees included, CPAs, Attorneys, Bankers, Financial Representatives and a host of other professionals. The Seminar was sponsored by the Financial Services Divsion of LaBovick Law Group, P.A.

Speakers at the Seminar included:

William Nortman, Esq., Akerman Senterfitt

Richard A. White, Turris Consulting, LLC

Moderator: Jeffrey S. Grubman, Esq, Jeffrey S. Grubman, P.A.

Topics coverd at the Seminar included areas such as: Investment fraud, Ponzi schemes, FINRA, Churning, Florida Investor Protection Act, Churning, and much more.

We look forward to sharing more information on our next educational seminar on investment and financial fraud.

If you would like to have a transcript of the seminar or more information on investment fraud, let us know.

Our vendor partner for this program, the Daily Business Review, will be publishing a printed version of the transcript in 3 - 4 weeks in their paper as a supplement.

Stay tuned...

Posted by LaBovick Law | | Comments (0)

Posted In: Brokerage Firm , FINRA , Firm News , Investment Fraud , Ponzi Scheme , Securities Fraud , Securities Industry , Securities Litigation , Stockbroker Issues

| Share
September 15, 2009

Judge rejects SEC and BofA Settlement of $33 million for Merrill takeover

Unfortunately, yesterday was not a great day for the SEC and the Bank of America legal team. Their $33 million agreed upon settlement regarding the BofA taking over Merrill Lynch was rejected by Southern District of New York Judge Jed S. Rakoff

Judge Rakoff entered strong words towards the SEC and Bank of America settelement in his 12-page order, in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Bank of America Corp., 09 Civ. 6829. The judge stated the following: "Overall, indeed, the parties' submissions, when carefully read, leave the distinct impression that the proposed Consent Judgment was a contrivance designed to provide the SEC with the façade of enforcement and the management of the Bank with a quick resolution of an embarrassing inquiry -- all at the expense of the sole alleged victims, the shareholders."

He continues to further scold the SEC with additional statements:

"When a federal agency such as the SEC seeks to prospectively invoke the Court's own contempt power by having the court impose injunctive prohibitions against the defendant, the resolution has aspects of a judicial decree and the Court is therefore obligated to review the proposal a little more closely, to ascertain whether it is within the bounds of fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy -- and, in some certain circumstances, whether it serves the public interest."

Judge Rakoff deems the settlement "neither fair, nor reasonable, nor adequate."

Click here to read more on the SEC and BofA settlement from the New York Law Journal.

Posted by LaBovick Law |

Posted In: Brokerage Firm , Legal Issues , SEC , Securities Industry

| Share
August 26, 2009

FINRA Arbitration against Ameriprise Financial Services

LaBovick Law Group, PA filed a FINRA arbitration against Ameriprise Financial Services, (NYSE: AMP), formerly known as American Express Financial Advisors (AEFA) for stockbroker misconduct and negligence. The claim alleges that Deborah Amilowski, Financial Advisor for Ameriprise Financial Services, failed to properly advise a Senior investor on risks associated with unsuitable products for a person of that age, at the time of the initial investment and negligence in properly identifying the beneficiary resulting in additional loss to the trust.

The FINRA Statement of Claim, filed on August 13, 2009, stated that Ms. Amilowski, recommended a RiverSource variable annuity as an initial investment to a 77 year old investor at the time of purchase, thus ineligible for a guaranteed death benefit. This investment was too risky for someone of this age.

Click on the following link to learn more on the FINRA Arbitration claim against Ameriprise Financial.

Posted by LaBovick Law | | Comments (0)

Posted In: Brokerage Firm , FINRA , Firm News , Investment Fraud , Securities Arbitration , Securities Fraud , Stockbroker Issues

| Share
July 24, 2009

Former Credit Suisse Group AG broker stands trial in New York for ARS fraud

The trial for USA v Tzolov and Butler 08-370 started this week in New York's U.S. District Court for the Eastern District.

The case involves two former Wall Street brokers that worked for Credit Suisse Group AG, Eric Butler and Julian Tzolov. They were charged with fraudulently dealing in subprime mortgage-backed auction rate securities (ARS) for corporate clients who specifically requested much safer investments.

The trial seems to be a pass the blame for the defense. The prosecution's argument is that the brokers mislead clients about auction rate securities deals, because of greed in trying to earn millions of dollars in commissions for risky investments instead of much safer investments such as government-guaranteed student loans. The defense cites an entirely different argument, they attribute the losses of the investments to the collapse of the real estate market instead of GREED.

It is important to note that one of the brokers, Tzolov, saw the writing on the wall and recently struck a deal with the prosecution. Eric Butler, pleaded not guilty, and decided to try his luck with a jury. His former partner in crime, Tzolov, struck a deal after pleading guilty, and will be a witness for the prosecution. His testimony should really be interesting.

According to a recent article published by Reuters

"The defendant and his partner promised something better, a better opportunity," U.S. prosecutor Greg Andres said in opening arguments to the jury.

"They did not honor that promise. They invested in securities the clients didn't ask for and didn't want."

This is an important trial to watch regarding investment fraud. The defense is trying to blame the market for the loss of the investors, instead of what seems to plague many Wall Street brokers and others accused of Securities and Investment fraud: GREED.

This makes me think of a statement from the famous fictional villain, Gordon Gekko, in the Oliver Stone movie Wall Street, "Greed is Good". I imagine that people such as Bernie Madoff, Michael Milken, Robert Allen Stanford, Arthur Nadel would all agree that "Greed carries a high price tag".

What will happen in the USA v Tzolov and Butler 08-370 case and the fate of former broker Eric Butler's fate? Time will tell...

Stay tuned...

Posted by LaBovick Law | | Comments (0)

Posted In: Brokerage Firm , Investment Fraud , Securities Industry , Securities Litigation , Stockbroker Issues

| Share

Connect

facebook twitter linkedin View Author's Justia Profile Subscribe to this blog's RSS feed

Contact Us

877-678-3838

Authors

Brian F. LaBovick, Esq.

Esther Uria LaBovick, Esq.

Mark R. Hanson, Esq.

Scott R. Haft, Esq.

Joseph R. Fields Jr., Esq.

Marcie Dodson, J.D.

Topics

Recent Entries

Archives

Legal Blogs